Many people believe that art can help increase our knowledge of the world through science. However, does the evidence I’ve cited prove conclusively that science NEEDS art to move forward in the future? Some scientists might not even need art to conclude their findings. Also, physicists and neuroscientists can soon have different techniques to find out the unknown without arts help. Also, some scientist may suggest that their field of work doesn’t need art to enhance their knowledge, math can figure that out. As a matter of fact, art could even complicate the subject. Science is already strong at concluding their findings so what if bringing art into complicates the whole idea they are trying to achieve? Even though some people may believe science needs arts help to go beyond their knowledge, art may just complicate their field of work.
Lila's Site
Just another UNEPortfolios site
